Posts tagged EFF

Text: I’ve been thinking a lot about what would happen if the internet censorship bills actually passed

I’ve thought about that too. And it was comforting at first, but then I thought of radio. Radio used to be less restrictive, with many smaller stations. In the seventies it wasn’t so difficult for small radio stations to offer differing voices. Then, slowly, the FCC’s restrictions favoring corporations began to take effect. Radio today is garbage: the least offensive songs anyone overplayed ad infinitum, backed by “radio personalities” who say nothing of substance as offensively as possible. But you probably know that.

If SOPA passed, at first only the torrent streaming sites would go away. Then it would be the music sites that don’t have label deals. Radical political sites would probably start to disappear next, but who reads those? Not most Americans. 

Eventually, Americans would become accustomed to the idea that the Internet isn’t supposed to have everything. They would become accustomed to going to sites that have the money to make deals with all the copyright holders. Remember there are still to this day people who think AmericaOnline is the Internet. Our adaptability is our greatest strength, and our greatest weakness.

falsettofetish:

And it’s making me feel a lot better.

Because millions, literally millions, of teenagers and twenty-somethings would go protest. Because we would have nothing else to do. And we would protest 24 hours a day, because some of us are awake all the time. And we would stand outside congresspeople’s offices with signs that were memes and they would be so confused and scared. And we will all be really pissed, and we will all be really bored, and that combination will be very very bad for them. So I’m less worried now. Maybe this whole thing is just a ploy by some well-meaning representatives who want to get young people more involved in the political process.

Quote: «The Court would be remiss if it did not take this opportunity to implore Congress to amend the Copyright Act to address liability and damages in peer-to-peer network cases such as the one currently before this Court… . While the Court does not discount Plaintiffs’ claim that, cumulatively, illegal downloading has far-reaching effects on their businesses, the damages awarded in this case are wholly disproportionate to the damages suffered by Plaintiffs. Thomas allegedly infringed on the copyrights of 24 songs—the equivalent of approximately three CDs, costing less than $54, and yet the total damages awarded is $222,000—more than five hundred times the cost of buying 24 separate CDs and more than four thousand times the cost of three CDs. While the Copyright Act was intended to permit statutory damages that are larger than the simple cost of the infringed works in order to make infringing a far less attractive alternative than legitimately purchasing the songs, surely damages that are more than one hundred times the cost of the works would serve as a sufficient deterrent… . Unfortunately, by using Kazaa, Thomas acted like countless other Internet users. Her alleged acts were illegal, but common. Her status as a consumer who was not seeking to harm her competitors or make a profit does not excuse her behavior. But it does make the award of hundreds of thousands of dollars in damages unprecedented and oppressive.»

This is a quote from judge Michael Davis, who was presiding over the first illegal downloading case to make it to trial.

There were three juries in this case, they charged the defendent:

Verdict 1: $222,000
Verdict 2: $1.92 million
Verdict 3: $1.5 million

for illegally downloading 24 songs.