For those of you who don't know, there has been some major movement around healthcare reform to further limit abortion rights.
Before I start, a quick history lesson:
Roe v. Wade was decided in 1973, in which the Supreme Court held that a woman may abort her pregnancy for any reason, up until the "point at which the fetus becomes 'viable.'" This case remains one of the most controversial cases to date. Since Roe v. Wade the Court's reasoning has been severely warped and limited with further cases such as Gonzales v. Carhart in 2007 (upholding the constitutionality of the Partial-Birth Abortion Act, an Act that was not grounded in scientific reasoning and opposed by the vast majority of medical and scientific organizations).
In 1977, Congress passed the Hyde Amendment which prohibited the use of federal funds to pay for a woman's abortion. This Amendment unfairly punished those women who were recipients of welfare. Women's rights activists and poverty/welfare activists were furious.
Despite the Hyde Amendment, a few states expanded their state Medicare coverage to cover the cost of an abortion. Out of these states, some will fund any elective abortion, while others will only pay for an abortion if pregnancy resulted from rape or if the pregnancy endangers the life of the woman.
In addition, many private health insurance companies provide coverage for abortions and abortion-related healthcare, including post-operation medications and examinations. Kaiser-Permanente is one of the largest health insurance companies to provide comprehensive health insurance coverage for women-- they are also one of the largest powerhouses to lobby federal government to prevent setbacks for women's rights. Yes, it might be driven by profit for them, but I'm excited to see that the pro-choice movement has at least one huge insurance company to fund these campaigns.
Now onto current events:
The heatlhcare reform debate in the House and Senate is being undermined by stupid Democrats. First, there was the Stupak Amendment that passed the House. The Stupak Amendment barred any insurance plan purchased with government subsidies from covering abortions. Essentially, this would prohibit any woman from getting her abortion covered by insurance. This takes the Hyde Amendment to a whole new level!
Not only is Representative Stupak a Democrat, but Nancy Pelosi, the first woman Speaker of the House, caved in and voted in support of the amendment to save the healthcare reform bill. That rings a 10 on my what-the-fuck scale.
But that's not the end. Senator Nelson (D-Nebraska) has now proposed a Senate Amendment that is identical to the Stupak Amendment. And guess who he partnered with to create such a gem of a legislation-- our old friend, Senator Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), the same Republican Senator who used the Senate Finance Committee in early November to pass a bill that would effectively restore $50 million for abstinence-only education.
That's it-- I've had it with the Democrats in office. I know I say this often, but I really don't see any difference now between the Republicans and Democrats in office. The only reason I have caved and voted Democrat in presidential elections is to protect a woman's right to choose. But now I can't even rely on that. Fuck, even our President spoke about healthcare in such ambiguous terms so as to not make any public statement for or against abortion rights. I just can't deal with this.
Next election, I refuse to vote Democrat. As someone who has always campaigned for presidential candidates (and yes, I phone banked for Kerry and then for Hillary and then for Obama), I refuse, REFUSE, to help elect another Democrat to office. The only issue I will fight for is no longer on their radar.
I urge you to take action to stop the Nelson-Hatch Amendment. Let's not undermine women's healthcare more than we already have! Click here to sign a petition and contact your Senators! The vote is TOMORROW, Tuesday, December 8, 2009, so act quickly!
P.S. I would have put a link to a NY Times article about the Nelson-Hatch Amendment, but for some reason they haven't published a story on it yet. Add tag for media bias.
Before I start, a quick history lesson:
Roe v. Wade was decided in 1973, in which the Supreme Court held that a woman may abort her pregnancy for any reason, up until the "point at which the fetus becomes 'viable.'" This case remains one of the most controversial cases to date. Since Roe v. Wade the Court's reasoning has been severely warped and limited with further cases such as Gonzales v. Carhart in 2007 (upholding the constitutionality of the Partial-Birth Abortion Act, an Act that was not grounded in scientific reasoning and opposed by the vast majority of medical and scientific organizations).
In 1977, Congress passed the Hyde Amendment which prohibited the use of federal funds to pay for a woman's abortion. This Amendment unfairly punished those women who were recipients of welfare. Women's rights activists and poverty/welfare activists were furious.
Despite the Hyde Amendment, a few states expanded their state Medicare coverage to cover the cost of an abortion. Out of these states, some will fund any elective abortion, while others will only pay for an abortion if pregnancy resulted from rape or if the pregnancy endangers the life of the woman.
In addition, many private health insurance companies provide coverage for abortions and abortion-related healthcare, including post-operation medications and examinations. Kaiser-Permanente is one of the largest health insurance companies to provide comprehensive health insurance coverage for women-- they are also one of the largest powerhouses to lobby federal government to prevent setbacks for women's rights. Yes, it might be driven by profit for them, but I'm excited to see that the pro-choice movement has at least one huge insurance company to fund these campaigns.
Now onto current events:
The heatlhcare reform debate in the House and Senate is being undermined by stupid Democrats. First, there was the Stupak Amendment that passed the House. The Stupak Amendment barred any insurance plan purchased with government subsidies from covering abortions. Essentially, this would prohibit any woman from getting her abortion covered by insurance. This takes the Hyde Amendment to a whole new level!
Not only is Representative Stupak a Democrat, but Nancy Pelosi, the first woman Speaker of the House, caved in and voted in support of the amendment to save the healthcare reform bill. That rings a 10 on my what-the-fuck scale.
But that's not the end. Senator Nelson (D-Nebraska) has now proposed a Senate Amendment that is identical to the Stupak Amendment. And guess who he partnered with to create such a gem of a legislation-- our old friend, Senator Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), the same Republican Senator who used the Senate Finance Committee in early November to pass a bill that would effectively restore $50 million for abstinence-only education.
That's it-- I've had it with the Democrats in office. I know I say this often, but I really don't see any difference now between the Republicans and Democrats in office. The only reason I have caved and voted Democrat in presidential elections is to protect a woman's right to choose. But now I can't even rely on that. Fuck, even our President spoke about healthcare in such ambiguous terms so as to not make any public statement for or against abortion rights. I just can't deal with this.
Next election, I refuse to vote Democrat. As someone who has always campaigned for presidential candidates (and yes, I phone banked for Kerry and then for Hillary and then for Obama), I refuse, REFUSE, to help elect another Democrat to office. The only issue I will fight for is no longer on their radar.
I urge you to take action to stop the Nelson-Hatch Amendment. Let's not undermine women's healthcare more than we already have! Click here to sign a petition and contact your Senators! The vote is TOMORROW, Tuesday, December 8, 2009, so act quickly!
P.S. I would have put a link to a NY Times article about the Nelson-Hatch Amendment, but for some reason they haven't published a story on it yet. Add tag for media bias.
Since this afternoon, rumors have it that this Amendment will not get far. However, please don't take that as permission to not take action!
Article to cite re: not getting far-- http://www.feministing.com/archives/019189.html
In case you want to watch the Senate debate live, go here: http://www.c-span.org/Watch/C-SPAN2.aspx